Google Search

Monday, June 27, 2011

'The Departed' Inspiration Whitey Bulger Caught

DepartedOne of the most famous crime stories in recent history is coming to a close: James J. "Whitey" Bulger has been caught after 16 years on the run.

As movie trivia junkies already know, Whitey was the inspiration behind the villain of Martin Scorsese's "The Departed." The freshly caught gangster's history laid the groundwork for an Oscar-nominated turn from Jack Nicholson as Frank Costello, mirroring Whitey's days as the head of a South Boston crime ring with all the terror and ruthlessness that Hollywood bad guys typically bring to the table.

It's not a surprise that the two look pretty similar on the surface, but once you start looking at the details, it's no contest: when compared to Frank Costello, Whitey Bulger was the more terrifying dude by miles. Get all the evidence you need to back that statement past the jump!

Frank Was Bad, Whitey Was Worse
In "The Departed," we get but a taste of Frank's villainous ways, snorting some cocaine, killing some Providence mafia members on occasion, showing off severed hands to instill fear in his people... you know, the usual stuff. But the depth of his control of the Boston crime rings was coated with a nice Hollywood sheen, and wasn't nearly as terrifying as Whitey's actual reign. We're talking extortion, loansharking, truck hijacking, arms trafficking, being the main distributor of cocaine and marijuana in the state of Massachusetts and, lest we forget, the occasional murder here and there. And he did this uninhibited for 20 years.

They Both Were Informants
Whitey Bulger was considered to be one of the FBI's top informants, which is supposedly how he was able to run hog wild for two decades. He used the cover to get rid of his enemies and strengthen his influence in Boston. It's unclear how long Frank was supposed to have been an informant at the FBI, but it certainly wasn't as overt as Whitey's relationship was. Plus, it was a movie. With Whitey, it actually happened.

But Whitey Wasn't Even A Good Informant
The impression we get from "The Departed" is that Costello was actually a fairly useful FBI informant, providing enough usable intelligence to keep himself on the playing field. Whitey, on the other hand, wasn't especially useful at all. By most accounts, Whitey didn't actually give up any information that the FBI didn't already know. In fairness, that keeps his criminal credibility a lot more intact than Frank's.

Southie Loved Them
There's no doubting that both Whitey's real criminal underworld and Frank's fictional one were complete menaces to society, but that's not to say that certain members in the Southie community didn't love them -- or, at least, feared them. White would be said to go and give away free turkeys on Thanksgiving, free groceries to the less fortunate, and so on. He acted as a Robin Hood of sorts -- except trafficking a lot more drugs and killing a lot more people, naturally.

Whitey Got Caught, Frank Got Killed
The biggest difference, of course, is the ending. Frank was killed fairly easily after he was outed as an FBI informant at the end of "The Departed." Whitey, on the other hand, was on the lam for sixteen years before getting caught. Sure, there had been sightings and alleged captures here and there, but until yesterday in Santa Monica, Whitey had been on America's Most Wanted list for almost two decades. That's a much more impressive ending than Frank's, if we do say -- though we'd also say we're very, very glad that he's been caught.

Tell us what you think in the comments section and on Twitter!

Tags the departed, Whitey Bulger


View the original article here

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Silence lifted: The untold stories of rape during the Holocaust

Rape stories out of the Congo, Bosnia and Sudan became part of these conflict narrativesSexual violence during the Holocaust, though, has not been widely discussedIt wasn't part of Nazi policy, but some say stories -- no matter how rare -- need to be heardBut the issue raises concerns among others who'd rather leave the subject aloneEditor's Note: This is the second of two stories focusing on rape as a tool of war. The first story looked at the role of interviewers of rape victims. Both stories contain graphic language; discretion is advised.

(CNN) -- The soldiers came for her at night. They took the girl to a barrack and forced her to watch a woman get raped.

The drunken men then set loose a dog to rip off the raped woman's breasts. Blood was everywhere. The woman passed out.

The young witness was next. Five soldiers held her down and took turns raping and sodomizing her. They spilled alcohol on her. They laughed. They said they'd kill her. She didn't yet have breasts for the dog to attack.

Later, her sister cleaned her up, but they didn't speak about what had happened. No one talked about such things. They didn't have to. Or maybe they couldn't.

The Congo? The former Yugoslavia? Libya? These allegations might have emerged from conflicts in any of these places.

Ex-Rwanda minister jailed for life on genocide, rape counts

But this brutal testimony reaches back more than 65 years to the Holocaust -- more than half a century before the United Nations declared rape a war crime.

Stories like this have the power to shock even those who think they know Holocaust history. The reason: They haven't been widely discussed.

Is that because victims didn't share these accounts? Did interviewers not ask the right questions? Or have influences -- both within academia and the Jewish community -- served to sweep such accounts under the historical rug?

A growing movement wants to peel back that rug. Scholars are revisiting old testimonies and documents -- and seeking new ones. Authors have published works to inspire conversation. Psychologists want to help survivors heal from their secrets. Activists, including feminist writer and organizer Gloria Steinem, hope these victims of the distant past can help shape a better future.

Libyan rebels say captured cell phone videos show rape, torture

But the topic of sexual violence during the Holocaust is fraught with controversy. Some observers believe it's a subject not sufficiently widespread or proven to warrant broad attention. Others fear it's driven by a microscopic view that deflects focus from what needs to be remembered. And still others feel that by pushing the issue, it may harm survivors who've suffered enough.

What everyone can agree on is this: When it comes to learning from those who lived through the Holocaust, time is running out.

Discussion and interruption

A spotlight on this dark subject was switched on with the late 2010 publication of a landmark book bearing a straightforward but telling title, "Sexual Violence against Jewish Women during the Holocaust."

The interdisciplinary anthology touches on everything from rape, forced prostitution and sterilizations to psychological trauma, gender identity issues and depictions of violence in the arts. Co-edited by Sonja Hedgepeth and Rochelle Saidel, it is believed to be the first book in English to focus exclusively on this subject.

Time: Stories of mass rape: Sifting through rumor, taboo in Syria

Hedgepeth is a professor of foreign languages and literature at Middle Tennessee State University. Saidel is a political scientist, author, and the founder and executive director of the Remember the Women Institute in New York City.

From left to right, are Rochelle Saidel, Nava Semel, Sonja Hedgepeth and Gloria Steinem in Brooklyn, New York. From left to right, are Rochelle Saidel, Nava Semel, Sonja Hedgepeth and Gloria Steinem in Brooklyn, New York.

These two women hope their book will spark serious discussion and exploration. But it resulted, at least in part, from an effort to keep them silent.

While running a workshop for teachers five years ago at Yad Vashem, Israel's official Holocaust memorial, the pair raised the subject of sexual violence against Jewish women. When Saidel -- author of the book "The Jewish Women of Ravensbrück Concentration Camp" -- mentioned rape at that camp, a leading Holocaust scholar interrupted her.

"You can't say that. ... Where's the proof?" Saidel remembers the man saying. "He continued to repeat this every time I ran into him." Saidel declined to name him.

She and Hedgepeth had been meeting younger scholars tackling this issue around the world, in the United States, Israel, Austria and Germany. They knew rape testimonies were on record. They thought if some scholars objected to their work, there likely were reasons they should continue.

When it comes to the Holocaust, what's acceptable for study has been "institutionalized," Hedgepeth says. "Certain topics are sanctioned and some are not."

Fitting into a narrative

Yellow stars. Ghettos. Cattle cars.

Concentration camps. Gas chambers. Crematoriums.

These are the images that typically come to mind when we think of the Holocaust.

Of the estimated 15 million civilians murdered by the Nazi regime during World War II, only Jews were targeted for systematic extermination. This doesn't mean others -- including Jehovah's Witnesses, Sinti and Roma ("Gypsies") and homosexuals -- weren't victims, but the "Final Solution" was devised to annihilate Jews.

By the end of the war, 6 million of them were gone -- or about two-thirds of European Jewry and a third of the world's Jewish population. This is what became widely known as the Holocaust or, in Hebrew, the Shoah.

In the years since, fueled by the oft-heard mantra "Never Again," historians have dedicated their lives to Holocaust studies. Museums and memorials sprouted up across the globe. Documentaries and feature films about the Shoah have earned accolades. Best-selling memoirs and diaries became assigned school reading.

With all that's been learned and discussed, the degree to which sexual violence fits into the Holocaust story remains a point of debate.

To make rape a significant part of the narrative, the numbers would have to be in the thousands or tens of thousands. We will never know how often it happened.
--Holocaust scholar Lawrence L. Langer

"I have no doubt that some women were raped," says Lawrence L. Langer, a preeminent Holocaust scholar.

But while rape is undoubtedly significant for those who are victimized, "the historical significance is very small in the context of the Holocaust experience," Langer says. "To make rape a significant part of the narrative, the numbers would have to be in the thousands or tens of thousands. We will never know how often it happened."

Myrna Goldenberg, another scholar and author, agrees that stories of rape need to be contextualized and that their scope shouldn't be exaggerated.

"We have to keep saying that this was still not the norm. This was not the Holocaust. It was the murder of Jews that was the Holocaust," she says. "But to assume the subject is untouchable is wrong. Women were tortured and raped. Breasts were cut off. How do you not talk about that? How do you not acknowledge that?"

Emerging voices

The path to this discussion has been paved by developments only seen with the passage of time.

Men made up the bulk of those who interviewed survivors in the first 40 years after the war, Goldenberg says, and they may have been reluctant to raise the question of rape. But after mass rapes during the Bosnian War of the 1990s came to light, she says some Holocaust survivors began, when she asked them, to share their own stories -- in whispers and out of earshot from their husbands.

Other accounts surfaced over the years in writings.

Even if rape wasn't the norm, it shouldn't be ignored, says Holocaust scholar Myrna Goldenberg. Even if rape wasn't the norm, it shouldn't be ignored, says Holocaust scholar Myrna Goldenberg.

Diaries emerged in which soldiers and eyewitnesses documented rapes during pogroms. Details of Nazi actions against Jews were chronicled in books by Soviet writers -- before being suppressed by Joseph Stalin and rediscovered decades later.

Included in these long-hidden publications were tales of women being singled out to dance naked before being raped and murdered. Soldiers stormed homes and victimized girls in front of parents, wives in front of husbands. Mass graves were opened to reveal women with removed breasts.

Then, around the time when the world was learning about the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia, the Oscar-winning film "Schindler's List" was released. Making this movie inspired director Steven Spielberg to create a foundation to gather stories of Holocaust survivors and witnesses.

Now, under the auspices of the University of Southern California, the USC Shoah Foundation Institute for Visual History and Education houses about 52,000 video testimonies recorded in 32 languages and 56 countries.

More than 1,700 testimonies include references to sexual assaults, an umbrella term that includes sexual harassment, abuse, molestation and rape, explained Crispin Brooks, curator of the institute's archive. Without revisiting each of the testimonies, Brooks said, he cannot say how many specifically mentioned rapes.

But he was able to break down many of the testimonies to show where or how the incidents occurred. Among them: 265 in camps, 21 during deportations, 272 in ghettos, 512 by liberators (often Soviet soldiers, he said), 12 during forced marches, 39 by those giving aid, 33 in hiding, 7 in refugee camps.

One camp survivor spoke of a pregnant woman who was raped in view of others before being tossed on a cart, never to be seen again. Another showed scars from beatings an officer doled out when he took her to clean his living quarters and raped her. A third saw her cousin taken away; the girl returned to the barrack bleeding, with a piece of bread clenched in her hand and a secret she'd never share.

Rape in wartime: Listening to the victims

Confronting concerns

Saidel, Hedgepeth and others who share their passion know they face obstacles in bringing attention to sexual assaults during the Holocaust.

Co-editors Rochelle Saidel, left, and Sonja Hedgepeth sign copies of their book at a Brandeis University event. Co-editors Rochelle Saidel, left, and Sonja Hedgepeth sign copies of their book at a Brandeis University event.

They say some people believe that focusing on gender-specific experiences takes away from the overall human and Jewish experience. Others have suggested that sexual violence against Jews wasn't a real issue because racial purity laws prohibited intercourse between Germans and Jews. And then there are those, they say, who are uncomfortable accepting testimonies as proof of occurrences.

But Saidel wants to know this: If historians are willing to look at how the Holocaust experience differed from country to country and camp to camp, why shouldn't they also examine how experiences differed between men and women?

As for the argument that racial purity laws protected Jewish women, she says, "That's absurd. That's like saying there are laws against rape so people don't get raped."

Such laws, she and others add, certainly didn't influence the actions of Nazi collaborators who weren't Aryan.

What this prohibition did do, they say, is prompt Nazi perpetrators to murder most victims after attacks. It also kept rape from being part of the official genocidal policy, a fact that distinguishes the Holocaust from what unfolded in places like Rwanda, Sudan and the former Yugoslavia.

And Helene Sinnreich, a contributor to Hedgepeth and Saidel's book, has a theory as to why testimonies aren't enough for some scholars. She is the director of the Center for Judaic and Holocaust Studies and associate professor of history at Ohio's Youngstown State University.

"Some historians' reluctance to utilize victim testimony in their construction of Holocaust history may be a result of a prejudice among them to utilize only 'official documents' or to combat accusations of Holocaust deniers by being able to demonstrate the facts through the words of the Nazis themselves," Sinnreich wrote.

'Branded by something that did not happen'

Some scholars would like to hit the pause button and force everyone to take a deep breath before continuing the rape conversation. Lawrence L. Langer is one of them.

He points out that the major camps had brothels staffed by prostitutes brought in from the outside to serve officers and guards. He also says that in death camps, women prisoners dropped to as little as 60 pounds and suffered from infectious diseases like typhoid and tuberculosis -- and that the SS would have been careful to stay away from them.

"In the context of the Holocaust," the significance of rape is small, says Holocast scholar Lawrence L. Langer. "In the context of the Holocaust," the significance of rape is small, says Holocast scholar Lawrence L. Langer.

But more significant, he's been interviewing survivors for 25 years, and he says none of them have ever spoken to him about rape. He also says rape didn't come up in the five years he spent screening Holocaust testimonies in Yale University's Fortunoff Video Archive, which now houses about 4,000 interviews conducted as far back as 1979.

Langer doesn't buy the argument made by some that his being male might have kept women from telling him such stories. He says he hasn't directly asked the question, but he trusts survivors to share what they need to share. He's heard the accounts of women who strangled their own babies, and in his mind talking about rape wouldn't be any more difficult.

"I always ask, 'What's the worst thing that ever happened to you?' No one has ever said, 'I was raped,'" he says. "This doesn't mean no one was."

Both Langer and Myrna Goldenberg contributed to a ground-breaking book co-edited by Lenore Weitzman. "Women in the Holocaust," published in 1998, is said to be the first book of original Holocaust scholarship dedicated to women.

First and foremost, Weitzman shares Langer and Goldenberg's angst that people will get the wrong idea about the extent of rape during the Holocaust. She stood up last month at a Washington event centered on the new anthology by Hedgepeth and Saidel to share her concerns.

She estimates that "less than a fraction of 1% of Jewish women" were raped, and says, "This book -- and the publicity around it -- give one the impression that it was common."

But she also worries that this focus on rape inappropriately sexualizes and stigmatizes female survivors. She's interviewed hundreds of them, and she says she arrived at the Washington event having just met with women who were upset about the attention given to this book.

Assuming rape was common "taints all women survivors," Weitzman says. "It is not that they don't want to discuss something that was painful, it is that they do not want to be branded by something that did not happen -- not to them or to their sisters or to their mothers or to their daughters. The real horrors they experienced were horrible enough."

It's a 'shanda'

Like other scholars, it's not that Weitzman doesn't believe rape occurred on occasion: "Of course it happened," she says. "If you have 6 million people murdered, everything happened. Anything in the world we might imagine could happen to a person probably did."

It is not that they don't want to discuss something that was painful, it is that they do not want to be branded... The real horrors they experienced were horrible enough.
--Lenore Weitzman, co-editor of "Women in the Holocaust"

But is it necessary to talk about rape? Maybe women don't want it discussed. Maybe victims, no matter how rare or prevalent they were, haven't shared their stories for a reason.

It isn't hard to imagine why a woman raped during the Holocaust might stay silent. Irrespective of circumstances, when it comes to sexual victimization, there's fear, shame and concern about being blamed or viewed as "damaged goods."

In Yiddish, there's a word, "shanda" (pronounced shonda, like Honda) which means shame or pity -- the sort that, if revealed, might cast one's family or even the entire Jewish people in a bad light. Especially for older generations, it's considered a shanda to talk about certain things. Rape, molestation or sexual relations that kept women alive, whether they were forced or chosen, would be among the stories many might say would be better kept to oneself.

Add to this, survivor guilt: the anguish many carried of having lived while millions perished. Still alive, some might wonder, what right would a raped survivor have to complain?

Plus, the mere title "survivor" carries with it a weight, responsibility and expectation. It means being part of a club that emerged from ashes to defy Hitler's Final Solution. What does it suggest if one also attaches "rape victim" to the label? Isn't being a survivor already heavy enough?

Bringing back 'ghosts'

Perhaps nowhere has Holocaust discourse been more loaded than in Israel.

A daughter of survivors, author Nava Semel was among a generation of Jews raised by parents who didn't talk about the war, or even the years before it. They were strong, lived in a Jewish nation and were nobody's victim. They didn't look back. They rushed to learn Hebrew, so they could stop using their native tongues. They focused on building new families, not remembering the ones they'd lost.

"The Holocaust was part of our calendar and our collective memory, but it was never mentioned in the private sphere," Semel says from her Tel Aviv home. "Parents didn't want to share the horrific experiences. They were trying to protect their children from the threat of the past."

Semel would be in her 20s before she heard stories. She found out her mother survived thanks to a "front whore" -- a camp inmate in her barrack who became an SS guard's "kept woman" and thereby saved the others. As if that wasn't surprising enough, there was a twist: The SS guard was a woman.

She fictionalized her mother's story in "A Hat of Glass," which Semel included in a collection of short stories of the same name. She says this book, published 40 years after the war, represented the first Hebrew prose to focus on the experience of children of survivors -- and to use the term "second generation" to describe them. Her protagonists were all sons and daughters who sought out the truth in order to grow. It forced open doors that were blocking conversations.

Survivors thanked her for giving them an entrée to talk. Many in her own generation, though, initially lashed out. They worried that she was "undermining the Israeli image," Semel says, by bringing back "ghosts" from the Diaspora.

Some ghosts, though, stayed hidden in the shadows, stashed away with memories people weren't ready to confront.

Nava Semel reads from her novel, "And the Rat Laughed," which touched on sexual abuse of hidden children. Nava Semel reads from her novel, "And the Rat Laughed," which touched on sexual abuse of hidden children.

More than 15 years after this conversation-starter came out, Semel published her novel, "And the Rat Laughed." It tells the story of a 5-year-old Jewish girl who was hidden on a Polish farm. In the potato pit where the family kept her, she was raped. Repeatedly.

But the girl grew up to be strong, a woman who survived her early-life horrors to become remarkable. Semel's 2001 book, which was adapted for the stage and may soon become a movie, let survivors who had been sexually abused -- both women and men -- know theirs was a secret others had, too.

Following the novel's publication, about a dozen survivors reached out to tell her she'd written their story.

One call came early, about 7 a.m. The sobs on the other end told Semel this was yet another survivor.

The woman on the line had never shared this part of her past -- not with her therapist or her husband -- but now allowed herself to feel. With the relief that comes from letting go, she unlocked the memory that had haunted her and was free to face it.

"Memory is an evasive entity; it's threatening," Semel said. "The memory will always be a part of them. But if I can voice whatever they cannot, if I can be their corridor to liberating them, they feel -- and can die -- less lonely."

Stories that slip out

For more than 20 years, Paula David worked full time with Holocaust survivors as they entered their final years.

The now-professor of gerontology at the University of Toronto was a social worker who coordinated Holocaust survivor groups, counseling and programs at Toronto's Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care -- a facility she says had the largest population of Holocaust survivors living in one place.

She's made it her mission to study the impact of early-life trauma on aging.

In working with women survivors, she knew there were unnatural reasons why some had never been able to bear children. She surmised there were memories that left others cowering when they visited doctors, especially gynecologists. She realized there was a history that prompted some to lash out and hit people when they were touched.

Maybe they didn't talk about the past because they didn't have the tools, the language. Many women David worked with grew up in shtetls, small villages, and in sheltered religious homes. Perhaps they lost their parents before they'd learned about sexuality.

For more than two decades, Paula David was a full-time social worker for Holocaust survivors in their final years. For more than two decades, Paula David was a full-time social worker for Holocaust survivors in their final years.

She built relationships with these women. She loved them. She didn't judge them if they told her they slept with men for food. "It wasn't sex, it was bread," she explains. She understood if they said they only tolerated sex with their husbands to create families. She tried not to flinch when one woman, who'd been saved by and fought alongside partisan soldiers, said she'd been raped multiple times every day for four years.

"What's there to say?" she remembers the woman answering dismissively, when David invited her to speak further. "You think they saved me because I was a Jew?"

She knew things these women didn't want their own children to know.

"I never had anyone at 85 or 90 say, 'I want to tell my kids,' " even if their kids were 70, David says.

But as the women aged, and in some cases dementia set in, there were those who lost their ability to self-censor or to consciously choose what they shared. In the facility where she and others looked out for these survivors, she heard and saw stories of sexual violence slip through their lips, without control and in the presence of loved ones. She devised ways to divert attention from what was being said, not only to protect the survivors but to protect those who were present and not able to get answers to their questions.

"Perhaps (these women) never wanted to be sitting in a chair in a nursing home, giving a blow by blow of rapes they experienced -- while their grandchildren are sitting there," David says. "And it's so painful for a family member to hear. It's exquisitely painful."

If survivors choose to share their stories, with clarity of mind and because it will help them, then wonderful. But she says they shouldn't feel pressure to open up. If they prefer to take their stories with them to the grave, so be it.

"How they've managed to live is by compartmentalizing," David says. "We all self-edit our life narratives."

Shaping the future

In the background a clock doesn't tick, it pounds. More than 65 years after World War II, the untold stories of Holocaust survivors -- the dwindling numbers that remain -- will soon be buried forever.

So if there are victims of sexual violence who want to talk -- to family members, therapists or in public -- now is the time.

Psychologist Eva Fogelman hopes survivors who were raped will speak up so they can be helped in their healing. Psychologist Eva Fogelman hopes survivors who were raped will speak up so they can be helped in their healing.

Eva Fogelman, a New York City psychologist who has worked with survivors and children of survivors for more than 30 years, hopes for their own sake that survivors with secrets will open up. She contributed to Hedgepeth and Saidel's anthology and says the book -- as well as the events and discussions around it -- can help validate the feelings of those who were raped and offer them permission to voice their stories and seek professional help.

"They need the validation for that particular pain and suffering ... to help them in their healing process," Fogelman says. And barring documentation, testimonies can provide "a more authentic sense of history."

Others say speaking up or examining stories of rape during the Holocaust is not just about personal healing or filling out history books. And it's certainly not meant to take away from the overall horrors that were the Holocaust.

It is, they say, about the greater good.

CBS reporter Lara Logan: I feared a 'torturous death' in Egypt

"Perhaps we would have been better able to prevent the rapes in the former Yugoslavia and the Congo if we had not had to wait more than 60 years to hear the truths that are anthologized in 'Sexual Violence against Jewish Women during the Holocaust,' " Gloria Steinem, pioneering feminist writer and organizer, wrote about the book.

Steinem stepped forward to moderate a book event this spring in Brooklyn that drew a packed audience. At the event were people like the Israeli author Semel, contributors to the book and activists working on behalf of women and girls.

At one point during the evening, a Rwandan woman stood and shared publicly, for the first time, the story of her rape at 14.

One person on the panel was Jessica Neuwirth, a women's rights lawyer.

Jessica Neuwirth is among those who believe sharing rape stories from the Holocaust may help women worldwide. Jessica Neuwirth is among those who believe sharing rape stories from the Holocaust may help women worldwide.

She's worked with the United Nations and served as an expert consultant on issues of sexual violence and rape as a tool of genocide. She's been a policy adviser for Amnesty International and is a founder and current chair of Equality Now, an international human rights organization established to end violence and discrimination against women.

Neuwirth envisions a day when Holocaust survivors will testify in front of the U.N., sharing their stories alongside women and girls from different generations, races, lands and conflicts.

But she fears it may be too late, that the victims who might have come forward are already gone. And of those who are still around, she worries such a time may never come.

"We usually have people dying to talk, and no one will listen," she says. "Now we have people dying to listen, but no one will talk."

If you have a story to share, your own or one of a family member or friend, please e-mail ravitz.feedback@cnn.com. Because of the volume of e-mails, we may not be able to personally reply to each one. If you want to comment on the story, please use the "soundoff" section below.


View the original article here

US boosts funds to fight Central American drug crime

Guatemala City – As Central America’s leaders sought more help from abroad this week in their fight against violent drug cartels, it was increasingly clear that solving the region’s security problems would require more than just money.

Presidents attending a two-day regional summit in Guatemala City warned that the current surge of violence, fueled by drug traffickers, threatens the entire hemisphere, and pledges for financial assistance from the US and development banks approached $2 billion dollars.

But doubts remain about whether leaders are prepared to implement the reforms needed to take on organized crime groups that often have more resources than the weak states they terrorize.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called on Central American countries to assume their “shared responsibility” in fighting drug traffickers. She announced that the administration would increase assistance to the region by $40 million to $300 million this year, still a much smaller amount than the billion dollar sums guaranteed to Mexico and Colombia in the past decade.

IN PICTURES: Mexico's drug war

“The folks at the State Department that are running the Central American Regional Security Initiative – they are very skeptical about the ability of Central American countries to absorb, and spend effectively and wiselyâ€

The Guatemalan capital provided a somber backdrop to the event, where heavily armed police patrolled the streets around the Westin Camino Real. Just days before the conference, candidates for mayor of a town outside Guatemala City considered suspending their campaigns after two opponents were assassinated. Elsewhere in the capital, neighborhood groups started barricading streets with bars and concrete to keep out criminals, Prensa Libre reported. The country’s homicide rate nearly doubled between 2000 and 2009, according to the Interior Ministry.

International donors committed $1.7 billion for security programs in Central America over the past three years, according to a study released this week by the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) and the Inter-American Development Bank. The report found a lack of coordination and communication between donors and recipient governments, which led to duplication of efforts and sometimes to conflicting goals.

“It’s not just an issue of quantity, but of quality and sustainability,” said Adriana Beltran, senior associate for citizen security at WOLA, in an e-mailed response to questions. “Many countries have tended to focus on short-term, heavy handed responses that have proven to be ineffective and counterproductive.”

Ms. Clinton said yesterday that efforts are beginning to resolve those problems through more high-level coordination, and this week’s conference was the first ever meeting organized by the Central American Integration System, a regional body founded in 1991, that focused specifically on security.

Sign up for our daily World Editor's Picks newsletter. Our best stories, in your inbox.

But if Central American presidents aren’t able to provide the leadership to find political consensus at home for much-needed reforms, it may not matter how much aid is offered. The struggle to raise taxes is a clear example of the constraints faced by cash-strapped governments like Guatemala, El Salvador, and Nicaragua.El Salvadoran President Mauricio Funes is fighting to implement a wealth tax to finance security spending, a concept modeled off a tax implemented by Colombia’s popular former President Álvaro Uribe.

In Costa Rica, President Laura Chinchilla is confronting resistance to a proposed casino tax, and in Guatemala, the government has struggled to boost revenue beyond 11.8 percent of gross domestic product, far below the Latin American average of 25 percent. Honduran lawmakers gave reason for optimism yesterday when they approved a temporary security tax on withdrawals from large accounts.

Even Clinton acknowledged in her speech that “businesses and the richâ€

The wealthy “don’t get any services from the state,” said Mr. Casas-Zamora, who was Costa Rica’s planning and economic policy minister from 2006 to 2007. “They don’t get healthcare from the state, they don’t get education from the state, they don’t get security from the state, and therefore are not willing to pay taxes.”

Part of their reluctance to pay may also stem from the widespread perception that higher taxes would only finance more corruption and waste.

“Guatemala is one of the least transparent countries in Central America,” said Pedro Trujillo, director of the Institute for Political Studies and International Affairs at the Universidad Francisco Marroquin in Guatemala City. “We don’t know very well how much the government spends. I don’t think your starting point can be that more money is needed until you’ve seen that spending has been efficient, and that funds are short.”

Even as leaders emphasized their willingness to work together, tensions were clear.

Guatemalan President Álvaro Colom said he understood the need to raise taxes, and countered that the region would benefit from strengthened US efforts to cut drug consumption and weapons trafficking.

Largely absent from the discussion was whether the US should begin to consider legalization as an alternative. After decades of fighting a bloody war on drugs, leaders including former Mexican President Vicente Fox are pressing to include it on the agenda, though it’s unlikely to gain much traction in the US, said Sylvia Longmire, author of the forthcoming book "Cartel: The Coming Invasion of Mexico's Drug Wars."

“For so long, the US has looked at itself as Latin America’s savior,” she said. “Sometimes we can help, and sometimes we can’t.”

Sign up for our daily World Editor's Picks newsletter. Our best stories, in your inbox.


View the original article here

Crime Stoppers dispelling myths

WELLAND — Stu Black wishes he could talk about the sexual predator who is now behind bars.

But the executive director of Crime Stoppers Niagara can't discuss that — or any other tip the organization received that successfully led police to thousands of arrests.

Doing so, he said during Tuesday's Welland city council meeting, would compromise one of the underlying principles the organization was founded on — anonymity.

If Black could talk about the dangerous offenders the program has helped police take off the streets, he hopes the communities would be more supportive of the work the independent volunteer-run organization does.

He's been visiting municipal councils across Niagara, asking for help dispelling myths about Crime Stoppers so more people "use a very valuable resource — one that's been working well, but one that could work a whole lot better."

Black said 75 to 77% of people think Crime Stoppers is run by police departments and receive federal government funding.

"They don't understand that we're volunteers."

People are also concerned that police will be knocking on their doors, or they'll be hauled in to court to testify, "or some harm could happen to their family."

He wants to reassure people that Crime Stopper's promise of anonymity "is for real and this really works."

A few years ago, he said lawyers tried to overturn the anonymity offered by Crime Stoppers, and took the case all the way to the Supreme Court. The court, however, ruled on the side of Crime Stoppers.

"We will never reveal a source," he added.

In most cases, Crime Stoppers doesn't know who's providing the tip. Callers to the service don't have to give their names, and their phones are not equipped with call display.

In 2009, he said Crime Stoppers Niagara had 1,000 tips, and 1,500 tips were passed on to police last year.

"The success rate is actually very impressive," Black said.

Not being able to share success stories has made it a little more difficult for Crime Stoppers to raise money to finance the cash rewards of up to $2,000 it offers in exchange for successful tips.

Often, however, he said people who earn the rewards are so happy to have the crime they've reported resolved that they don't even accept the cash.

abenner@wellandtribune.ca

Discuss this Article
Topic guidelines: We welcome your thoughts, stories and information related to this article. Please stay on topic and be respectful of others. Keep the conversation appropriate for interested readers.


View the original article here

'Popular Crime,' Where Good Writing Transcends Genre

The cover of Popular Crime.

Bill James has written a true-crime book, Popular Crime: Reflections on the Celebration of Violence, and you will probably enjoy it if 1) you've enjoyed James's other work; 2) if you've never heard of James, but like the true-crime genre; or 3) if you've never heard of James and you have historically avoided the true-crime genre because so much of the writing therein is so very terrible.

James (who discussed Popular Crime on Weekend Edition in May) is best known as the father of sabermetrics, a school of statistical analysis (for lack of a better term) that attempts to answer questions about baseball using objective data — questions like "Who was really 'better,' Willie Mays or Mickey Mantle?" and "What is the worst MVP selection of all time?" If you don't care for either arithmetic or baseball, you may not find the idea of a master of both those topics discussing the Lindbergh case very appealing, but James isn't the father of sabermetrics because he came up with innovative ways to gauge and discuss performance on the diamond. He did do that, but to a certain extent, thanks to the advent of personal computing at the time he began publishing his annual Baseball Abstracts, and to the work of others in the same field, sabermetrics' time had come.

James's particular gift, the aspect of his work that's in large part responsible for his "father" status, is his writing — specifically, that it's very good.

 

Very good writing is a rarity, period, but it's a particularly endangered species in baseball books and true crime, genres in which I read voraciously, and the Venn overlap between the two subjects is usually (with the exception of the Black Sox) bad writing. Crappy, strained prose gathers on both baseball bios and serial-killer compendia like cat hair on a black pantleg: overwrought descriptions, flabby entendres, egregious agenda-pushing, abuse of innocent synonyms for "heroic."

James doesn't indulge in the "behold the poetry of our national game" flatulence that many baseball readers have come to accept as an unwelcome given; he's direct, conversational, and able to crack a joke or turn a flavorful phrase without excessive folksiness. He translates the left-brain workings of his formulae for right-brain fans like me who have an easier time following a narrative arc than an algorithm. His essay about the 1985 postseason does contain a fair amount of arithmetic, but it's used in the service of the story, and it's a story itself as well.

James, currently a consultant for the Boston Red Sox, doesn't apply calculus to the famous American crime stories of the last two centuries (although I'd have read an attempt to do so with interest). He just writes about various famous cases in his characteristic frank way, with the occasional elegant turn of phrase that feels almost like an afterthought. Here's James's sketch of 1849 murder victim Dr. George Parkman:

He was a tall, thin man who walked bent forward at the waist with quick, energetic strides, his long nose, long chin and prominent Adam's apply poking forward like a trident, wearing the top hat and tails that were his generation's best effort at dignity.

One sentence gives you a dimensional sketch of a man, and of his time — no bloviating on Victorian values, no self-seriousness. Later, in the context of the Sacco/Venzetti case, James notes of the contemporary divide between haves and have-nots that "Mine owners made huge fortunes enabling them to make showy displays of wealth, while miners lived like rodents," a deceptively simple phrasing that contains all the necessary information. He describes a notorious attorney as "usually divorced," a wonderful term for the Larry Kings of the world, and refers to Lyle and Erik Menendez as "twerps." Such an unserious word for men who murdered their parents for money, and yet, once it's pointed out, you can't help but acknowledge the evident and deep reserves of twerpishness in that family, particularly in Lyle.

James writes an excellent, brisk passage dismissing the idea that the assassination of JFK kicked off the capital-S Sixties as we know them; I don't know that I agree with the alternative he proposes, but that he even raised it got my attention. I definitely don't agree with his conclusions about Lizzie Borden, or his contention that "Michael Jackson was never at any point in his life one of the 100 most famous people in the world."

You may agree with his work in those areas, but then find his take on Lindbergh, or Bambi Bembenek, or Bundy absurd. You may think his proposal for a radical overhaul of the U.S. corrections system is brilliant, or unworkable, or an excuse to do some off-putting complaining about liberals; you may think all three things about it, as I did. What you will not think is that it's boring, or that a proofreader needs to give her paycheck back. Popular Crime does what James has historically done so well in his baseball writing — it asks questions that seem to have no answers, and tries to answer them anyway, as clearly as possible.

I've heard James mention that he began the project — more than 20 years ago — because he too reads true-crime books voraciously, and saw no reason why he couldn't write one himself, an unsucky one. The result is a fascinating read that also recommends (or doesn't) other titles in the genre, and isn't afraid to snark on the writing. James's takedown of Mark Pettit's overview of the John Joubert case, A Time To Kill:

Pettit's book is OK, short and to the point, although it is punctuated with regrettable sentences such as "The teenager gasped at the red-hot streamer of pain that lanced through his body" ... John Joubert was executed in Nebraska in 1996. Pettit's editor is still at large.

Heh.

Best of all, James defends those of us who care deeply about true crime — or baseball, or coin-collecting, or Madonna, or any other subject that's deemed fluffy or "pop," and is therefore not held to the intellectual or craftsmanship standard of something like literary fiction. And he does it with typical concision: "[P]eople have a legitimate need to enjoy their lives. To pursue the things that make life enjoyable is not un-serious."

This is what I like about James's writing and his approach to it. He takes his work and his subjects seriously, but he doesn't take himself seriously. He says what he thinks, and sends you on your way — to a local bookshop to buy Popular Crime, I hope, because it's well-written, thought-provoking, and ungory.

Sarah D. Bunting writes about baseball, Bembenek, and twerps at TomatoNation.com.


View the original article here

Crime Stats Audit Leaves Unanswered Questions

By Phil Williams
Chief Investigative Reporter

Nashville police are declaring victory following the release of a long-awaited audit of how the city keeps crime statistics.

But, it turns out, that audit may not tell the whole story.

That Metro report concludes that auditors "did not observe any intentional manipulation" of crime stats by Metro police. Still, in interviewing police personnel, they found officers who had "a negative view of the process and/or had little faith in the accuracy of the numbers reported."

Mayor Karl Dean requested the audit after questions raised by a NewsChannel 5 investigation.

"The primary purpose of this audit was to determine if we were reporting our crime statistics in a reasonable manner," Police Chief Steve Anderson said before the report was released.

"The answer to that, as determined by internal audit, is 'yes.' A secondary purpose was to determine if there was any manipulation of that data. And the answer to that was 'no.'"

Yet, the 51-page audit does not address some of the biggest problems uncovered by an exclusive NewsChannel 5 investigation -- including rapes committed against some women that, for years, just weren't counted.

NewsChannel 5 Investigates talked to the victims, comparing their stories to the crimes that police recorded -- like burglaries written off as mere cases of vandalism.
Related story: Nashville Police Don't Count Some Burglaries

We asked Metro Auditor Mark Swann, "Did you interview victims?"

"We did not interview victims," he answered, explaining that they focused on reviewing the data, along with a sample of incident reports.
Swann said his team did find an error rate of about 10 percent in how Metro police classified crimes.
"Could a 10 percent error rate have skewed the year-to-year reporting numbers?" NewsChannel 5 Investigates asked.

"On an individual category basis, yes -- or a clearance basis, yes," the auditor acknowledged.
Yet, the auditors did not specifically dig into what police told the Metro Council about their huge success in "cases cleared by arrest" -- violent crime (76.5  percent), aggravated assault (82.4 percent) and forcible rape (122.8 percent).
Related story: Expert: Nashville's Crime Clearance Stats 'Not Credible'

Off camera, a police spokesman now calls those claims a "colossal mistake."
NewsChannel 5 Investigates asked Swann, "You all did not audit every single slide that the chief of police presented to the Metro Council?"

"No," he said.

Then, there were an astounding number of rape reports written off as "matters of record" -- meaning they did not count in any crime stats.
Related story: Metro Crime Stats Ignore Hundreds of Sex Assault Cases

 After NewsChannel 5 uncovered the problem, Metro police reclassified hundreds of sexual assault cases.
Related story: Police Admit Public Not Told Truth About Rapes

Yet, the problem appears nowhere in the audit.
"Did the audit specifically look at how sexual assaults were classified?" we wanted to know.

"The audit did not look at a specific crime," Swann responded.
As for the type of crime stats relied upon by Metro officials, the audit says those numbers may provide an "incomplete" picture.

Instead, it suggests using different stats kept by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation that -- instead of six straight years of decline, as Metro police claimed -- show crime was actually up three of those six years.

In addition to reclassifying hundreds of sexual assault cases, police brass sent officers back to school for refresher training.

And, in the audit, they're promising other measures to make sure that crime is reported accurately in the future.

E-mail: pwilliams@newschannel5.com

Read audit of Metro police crime stats

Back to NC5 Investigates: The Truth About Crime

On Facebook:
Become a NC5 Investigates fan: facebook.com/nc5investigates
Become a Phil Williams fan: facebook.com/nc5philwilliams 

Back to NewsChannel 5 Investigates
 


View the original article here

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Crime Does Not Pay - Except on American Television


It seems almost impossible to find a prime time television show that doesn't have something to do with crime. The huge popularity of the CSI kind of show is amply embellished with dozens of other crime shows that fill the venue to the brim almost every night of the week. Far from being a comprehensive list here are just some of the offerings from the American idea of crime and punishment. CSI, CSI Miami, CSI New York, NCSI, Forensic Files, NYPD Blue, Law and Order, Law and Order SUV, The Closer, Shark, Cold Case Files, First 48, Missing, Without a Trace, Criminal Minds, City Confidential, Psychic Detective, Mission Road, The Shield, etc. What remains after these shows may also be filled with violence, shows like, Alias, The Unit, Smith, to just name a few.

Do we have a stomach for this much violence? And where are your kids when these shows are on? The question "Do you know where your kids are tonight" might have lost all of its import because if they were in front of the TV they will no doubt see more crime than they might ever encounter on the street.

The nature of the crimes shown is changing as well. Perhaps the producers are driven by competition but the graphic depictions of the crimes are becoming more morbid and extreme. The shows also must be digging down to the bottom of the barrel to find the newest twisted offerings of the criminal element. Bizarre seems to be the best word to describe the new trend toward totally off the wall murders and violence. Must we see the bullet as it rips through every muscle and tissue of the body? Do we have to wade into the mind of the criminal who plans out every twisted detail of a crime that most of us could not imagine if we wanted to? When is enough, enough?

Wrestling and ultimate fight shows take up the slack and they are often watched by children. They almost serve as a primer for when parents will let them sit and watch the blood and gore of the crime shows. Are they just innocuous fillers? Children don't know that the wrestling shows are choreographed, rehearsed and already decided on long before they get to the arenas and TV Screens. But here's the rub, millions of adults don't know it either or they just don't want to know.

Harmless entertainment? The next time you see a wrestler thrown from the top of a ladder to a table outside of the ring or being beaten over the head with a metal chair look up. Look up at the thousands of youngsters with their eyes and jaws stretched open to the limit. Those children are the most likely candidates for becoming the next subject of the crime shows.

Media in general doesn't care about countless studies that positively link violent shows and games to school violence and later to street crime. There's a buck to be made and who's worrying about your kids?

The law enforcement figures in the crime shows are touted as heroes. They doggedly persist with forensic tools, savvy and determination until the criminal is finally stopped. There is a kind of falsehood about their heroism because it is like the case of the person who constantly sweeps out the cobweb but never does anything about the spider. Men and women who espouse a change of heart in individuals like preachers and evangelists are ignored or labeled as bible thumpers or charlatans that pander to the meek and those who are not as self reliant.

The public trend is to view the preacher as someone on the level of a used car salesmen and thereby dismiss the message of the messenger. As in any profession not all preachers come out pristine...so what. This is a quiescent or passive form of hypocrisy. No one ceases to see the doctor just because some of them have been sued for malpractice. No one refuses to call the cops when their in trouble just because some cops are dishonest. The message will stand regardless of how many preachers fall. What is that message?

Put simply the Bible says that the real problem with society can always be narrowed down to one single element and one single person at a time. The problem is the individual human heart; it is as prone to its own selfishness and devices as it was thousands of years ago. It can only be dealt with by conversion. Reformation, religion, police, psychiatry, social programming and nothing else can permanently change the human heart. Christ alone through the indwelling power of God's Holy Spirit can change the human heart. Christ deals with the spider not the cobweb.

If man was intrinsically good and every heart was a wellspring of benevolence then our world would not be in the shape it is today. Crime shows would be non existent. And the scripture would not say...The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? Jeremiah 17:9

Of course the great and mighty god we know as the dollar will keep the crime programs on the production line regardless of what a few preachers say, that's understood. And just how much does crime pay. There are no clear statistics on the matter but a safe guess would be in the multi billions of dollars. The producers, actors and others making the crime shows have little doubt that the old adage "Crime Doesn't Pay" is just a bunch of phooey.

The accountants who keep the books for the media could readily prove that for the moment crime does pay. Those who keep the book of life would remind us that..."The wages of sin is death." Romans 6:23

The sponsors of the crime shows are paying dearly to have their products aired on these shows and we are paying dearly by having our senses bombarded to the point of numbness. The cost to our children is that they have become a generation of violence fed

future potential crime suspects. The weak minded, misguided and violent prone are taking advantage of an education in crime brought to them at no cost replete with ideas for crimes they could never have generated on their own.

Do we actually love violence? It would seem we do and every great nation, kingdom or empire before us did as well. In fact a careful examination of the historical pattern would reveal that every major power in this world has experienced a rise in violent activities just before they reached the peak of their power. Unfortunately the only thing that remains after reaching the peak of power is the fall from power and that too was usually very violent. The love of violence or just a preoccupation with it has consequences on a larger scale. That too is what brought ancient kingdoms to their end. America can produce nothing that would cause it to escape the same fate unless we awake. Although the call may not be heard above the roar of the trendy crowd and the noise of money it still stands. What is that call and what is that warning? Come see.

The LORD trieth the righteous: but the wicked and him that loveth violence his soul hateth. Psalm11:5

Yea, in heart ye work wickedness; ye weigh the violence of your hands in the earth. Psalm 58:2

Thus saith the LORD; Execute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place. Jeremiah 22:3

My face will I turn also from them, and they shall pollute my secret place: for the robbers shall enter into it, and defile it. Make a chain: for the land is full of bloody crimes, and the city is full of violence. Ezekiel 7:22, 23

They hatch cockatrice' eggs, and weave the spider's web: he that eateth of their eggs dieth, and that which is crushed breaketh out into a viper. Their webs shall not become garments, neither shall they cover themselves with their works: their works are works of iniquity, and the act of violence is in their hands. Isaiah 59:5, 6




Rev Bresciani is the author of two Christian books one that is entirely on the second coming of Christ. He is a contributing columnist for several online news and commentary sites. His articles are read throughout the world. Please enjoy a visit to http://www.americanprophet.org